Posts tagged with: "supreme+court" Results 1 - 20 of 345,824
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2024, 1:29 pm by Aimee Hess
The Texas Supreme Court recently considered oil and gas leases that involved the interaction of the “free use of gas” clause and the royalty due on gas used off the leased premises. [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:17 pm by Emily Papania
  We will continue to monitor the impact of the Supreme Court’s decision in Smith and provide updates as they become available. [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:07 pm by John Ross
The Supreme Court just held that Title VII's ban on sex discrimination includes discrimination based on gender identity. [read post]
17 May 2024, 12:37 pm by Ilya Somin
More has been written about this decision than almost any other Supreme Court case. [read post]
17 May 2024, 12:29 pm by Josh Blackman
Third, Justice Jackson correctly cited one of the most misinterpreted lines in Supreme Court history: When the Constitution's text does not provide a limit to a coordinate branch's power, we should not lightly assume that Article III implicitly directs the Judiciary to find one. [read post]
The Arkansas Supreme Court on Thursday upheld four voting restriction laws passed in 2021. [read post]
17 May 2024, 11:40 am by David S. Mordkoff
In 2019, in response to the “#MeToo” movement, the New Jersey Legislature enacted a law that made any “non-disclosure provision” in an employment contract or settlement agreement unenforceable against the employee, if the provision had “the purpose or effect of concealing the details relating to a claim of discrimination, retaliation, or harassment. [read post]
17 May 2024, 11:40 am by David S. Mordkoff
In 2019, in response to the “#MeToo” movement, the New Jersey Legislature enacted a law that made any “non-disclosure provision” in an employment contract or settlement agreement unenforceable against the employee, if the provision had “the purpose or effect of concealing the details relating to a claim of discrimination, retaliation, or harassment. [read post]
17 May 2024, 11:34 am by Legal Profession Prof
The Indiana Supreme Court has suspended an elected judge for 45 days "The United States legal system is based upon the principle that an independent, impartial, and competent judiciary, composed of men and women of integrity, will interpret and apply... [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:00 am by Maribeth Meluch
Supreme Court Clarification on Title VII Harm Requirements The Supreme Court found that both parties were measuring the impact of the transfer on the plaintiff incorrectly. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:00 am by Howard Bashman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania agrees to consider whether to limit availability of “statutory employer” defense: Yesterday, the Pennsylvania’s highest court issued this order granting review in the case. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:00 am
From a new Internal Revenue Service (IRS) notice that extends relief for some beneficiaries of inherited individual retirement accounts (IRAs) to the release of a final rule by the Social Security Administration (SSA) omitting food from Supplemental Security Income (SSI) in-kind support and maintenance calculations and a US Supreme Court case clarifying the harm that must be shown for employees to make a Title VII discrimination claim, we have recently seen significant legal… [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:50 am by Howard Bashman
“Ghostwriters Try Steering Supreme Court Justices Away from Cases; No rule against practice seen in opposition briefs; Ethical question of misleading the justices raised”: Lydia Wheeler of Bloomberg Law has this report. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:44 am by Howard Bashman
“The Supreme Court decides not to trigger a second Great Depression; Two justices dissent”: Ian Millhiser has this essay online at Vox. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:36 am
Clearly a story that should have happened in the Magic City, 2) Sam Alito- Supreme Court Justice- had an upside-down American Flag outside his home two weeks after January 6. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:36 am by Eric Goldman
Only time will tell whether the Ninth Circuit—and perhaps eventually the Supreme Court—will choose to scrutinize data-related contracts under the conflict preemption doctrine after decades of refusal to do so under the express preemption approach. [read post]