Search for: "Patrick C. Toomey" Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2023, 6:54 am by SCOTUSblog
Spouses (James Nani, Bloomberg Law) The Supreme Court Needs to Rein In the Surveillance State (Patrick [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 5:46 am by Just Security
Transparency to National Security Uses of Artificial Intelligence by Faiza Patel (@FaizaPatelBCJ) and Patrick [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 6:34 am by Just Security
_PMolnar) National Security Carve-Outs Undermine AI Regulations by Faiza Patel (@FaizaPatelBCJ) and Patrick [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 7:04 am by Just Security
Intelligence Surveillance The Government’s Section 702 Playbook Doesn’t Work Anymore by Patrick [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 7:20 am by Just Security
Security: The Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board  by Faiza Patel (@FaizaPatelBCJ) and Patrick [read post]
30 Sep 2023, 6:49 am by Just Security
Surveillance: The Government’s Disappearing Section 702 Notices by Sarah Taitz (@SarahTaitz) and Patrick [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 1:33 pm by James Hamilton
R-NE), Richard Shelby (R-AL), the Ranking Member of the Senate Banking Committee, David Vitter (R-LA), Patrick [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 7:34 pm by Sara Amundson
Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) and Patrick Toomey (R-Pa.) in the Senate bill, will prevent this appalling [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 9:05 pm by Bobby Chen
privacy concerns implicated by both commercial and government satellite tracking, according to Anne Toomey [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 5:48 am by Michael Markarian
Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., Chris Coons, D-Del., Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., and Patrick [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 1:30 pm by Michael Markarian
Patrick Toomey, R-Pa., and Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., and Reps. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 11:53 am by Michael Markarian
Patrick Toomey, R-Pa., and Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., and Reps. [read post]
25 Oct 2024, 6:25 am by Just Security
rsquo;s attention to accountability, too, in that the NSM treats lack of accountability as a risk (4.2(c) [read post]