Search for: "Pam Samuelson"
Results 121 - 137
of 137
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2013, 7:19 am
Pam Samuelson told a story about a trip to Hanoi with grads, when the richest people on the [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 5:35 pm
Internationally, nations can decide (Afghanistan bars marks that are harmful to chastity).Pam [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 10:25 am
Pam Samuelson: writing was pretty much the melody prior to 1976, so that history might support [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 3:02 pm
Merges, Pam Samuelson, Tim Wu, and more herein.Compulsory Licensing of Music, GenerallyA compulsory [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 12:11 pm
exceptions attempting empirical categorization—Beebe analyzing what courts say about the factors, Pam [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 11:02 am
To echo Pam Samuelson, Monsanto is simply not the victory for strong trade secret law that some people [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:25 pm
Property concept.A: TM cases dealing with statutory damages tend to cite copyright cases.Said: Pam Samuelson [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 11:32 am
On how copyright fair use doctrine will apply to AI training: Pam Samuelson gives [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 10:41 am
(Ever heard of Pam Samuelson, Mr. Segal?) [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 8:28 am
that fair use is not as uncertain as all that, made by the Best Practices folks and by people like Pam [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 7:35 am
[This is maybe one more reason to identify classes of cases, the way Pam Samuelson has for copyright [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 6:12 pm
Pam Samuelson: would a more precise jury instruction about protectable elements of a musical work help [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 5:28 am
Pam Samuelson has a great draft paper about how to judge copyright suitability for cases like [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 7:48 am
Pam Samuelson: will audits be publicly available? [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 8:59 am
Drawing on the work of others like Orly Lobel, Pam Samuelson, and Rochelle Dreyfuss,  [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:43 am
A: I like Pam Samuelson etc. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 12:41 pm
offers a direct challenge to arguments made by Michael Madison, Peter Jaszi & Patricia Aufderheide, Pam [read post]
