Search for: "Hugh Tomlinson, QC" Results 61 - 80 of 158
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2016, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Print, “Serious Harm” under the Defamation Act 2013 and the drawing of inferences – Hugh [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Rowbottom Case Law: Gulati v MGN Ltd, A landmark decision on the quantum of privacy damages – Hugh [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
Waterhouse family, but I consider Online Publication Claims: A Practical Guide (edited by Hugh [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 4:55 am by INFORRM
According to the “Mail on Sunday” the Leveson assessor and Liberty Director Shami Chakrabarti has “delivered the bombshell verdict that his demand for compulsory press regulation would be illegal”.  The BBC has, in turn, reported the story under the headline “Leveson report proposals ‘would be illegal‘”.  This is distortion of Ms Chakrabarti’s views which, as is clear from the report, relate to matters which do not form part of its… [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
of India, Supreme Court recognises a constitutional right to privacy in a landmark judgment – Hugh [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
One of the issues lawyers often get asked by their clients is what steps they can take to get unlawful or offensive content removed from the internet without having to bring legal proceedings. The major providers of information society services all provide takedown and complaint forms so that issues can be raised about unlawful material which is published or made available by them. In many cases these forms can be used to have unlawful content removed altogether, while in other cases such requests… [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 10:31 pm by Charon QC
  Hugh Tomlinson QC considers this here:  Is compulsory regulation of the print media compatible [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 10:31 pm by Charon QC
  Hugh Tomlinson QC considers this here:  Is compulsory regulation of the print media compatible [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 10:31 pm by Charon QC
  Hugh Tomlinson QC considers this here:  Is compulsory regulation of the print media compatible [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
of India, Supreme Court recognises a constitutional right to privacy in a landmark judgment – Hugh [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 9:31 am by INFORRM
of Beyond Contempt: the Inside Story of Phone Hacking Trial Alasdair Pepper, Carter-Ruck David Price QC [read post]
4 Dec 2012, 1:37 am by INFORRM
compensatory damages by an Indian court Opinion: “Defamation and False Privacy” – Hugh [read post]
15 May 2011, 11:10 am by Charon QC
Hugh Tomlinson QC and others have written serious analyses of the issue. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
Hugh Tomlinson QC Defamation Act 2013: Does section 1 replace the test of the hypothetical reasonable [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
The Mail on Sunday and the Daily Telegraph are alarmed about ‘secret arrests’ – which, as usual, they blame on Lord Justice Leveson.  The complaint concerns proposed new guidelines from the Association of Chief Police Officers under which “forces will be banned from confirming the names of suspects”. The Mail calls it “a chilling new threat to the right to know” and holds out the prospect of people being swept off the streets in the manner of North… [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 4:30 am by INFORRM
Media, Communication and Power) Online Harms White Paper: Two comments on “harms” – Hugh [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 1:01 am by Adam Wagner
European Convention On Human Right, which protects free speech (Update: for more, see this post by Hugh [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 5:26 am by INFORRM
of India, Supreme Court recognises a constitutional right to privacy in a landmark judgment – Hugh [read post]