Search for: "Jane C. Ginsburg"
Results 41 - 60
of 82
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2011, 5:06 am
Argument of the day: Jane Ginsburg suggests YouTube might not be a service provider under the DMCA. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 1:00 am
collection brings together 19 contributors (Irene Calboli, Vincenzo Di Cataldo, Peter Drahos, Rochelle C. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 2:46 pm
copyright too, where the influential role of women is again clearly apparent and names such as Rochelle C. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 3:04 am
Lionel Bently, University of CambridgeEdited by: Jennifer Davis, University of CambridgeEdited by: Jane [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:43 am
Unpersuasive explanations: widely known love of opera and art (other Justices have those too); Jane Ginsburg [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 4:03 am
The Svensson ruling: much anticipated and discussed the CJEU judgment in Svensson (C-466/12 [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 1:23 pm
Jane C. Ginsburg, Columbia Law School, New YorkProf. Martin J. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 10:35 am
I'm very excited to announce that I've signed on to this casebook, available through Carolina Academic Press including in a more-affordable looseleaf version. I have enjoyed teaching the casebook for many years and I particularly appreciate its division of registration from infringement. I'm looking forward to working on updates (the task of the next few years, as there is a full new edition this year). If anyone is interested in notes, slides, or example midterms/exams, I'm… [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 10:25 am
the Second Circuit ruled in favor of Fox, CBS, NBC, and ABC... and the public's right to hear Jane [read post]
29 May 2020, 12:30 am
the Treaty, to confirm if there is a law or a draft bill that implements or domesticates the Treaty; c) [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 9:31 am
Jane Ginsburg: Author-unfriendliness is another nasty effect of the notice requirement. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 7:21 pm
Jane Ginsburg wrote an article in 2003 entitled "How Copyright Got a Bad Name For itself. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 1:06 pm
Columbia Law Professor Jane C. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:25 am
something like this would be protectable.We don’t know how many © there are in garments, b/c [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 9:18 am
sense of rejecting need for license is irrelevant: not unfair because D initially sought a license b/c [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 10:22 am
Gregory C. Cook and Jocelyn D. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 8:59 am
No fair use b/c of market harm: deprives Fox of revenues to which it was entitled.Fair use is the incorrect [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:50 pm
Nancy C. Patterson and Prentice T. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 4:15 am
Hugh C. Hansen, Fordham University School of Law1. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 9:33 pm
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a recent Columbia Public Law research paper, Jane C. [read post]
