Search for: "Michael McConnell" Results 461 - 480 of 500
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by JB
Board of Education follows from the original public meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment is Michael McConnell [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
For example, Michael McConnell’s pathbreaking article on “Originalism and the Desegregation [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 2:59 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
mdash;Judge Brett Kavanaugh, professor Richard Epstein, Clarence Thomas, Theodore Olsen, Ken Starr, and Michael [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Chao Created Special Path for McConnell’s Favored Projects Politico – Tucker Doherty and [read post]
8 May 2008, 12:02 pm
So it really doesn't matter so much what Michael McConnell's first-order theory of the Constitution [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 10:52 am
On the merits, their arguments -- originally championed by Judge Michael McConnell when he was a Chicago [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 4:22 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  A week ago, Stanford Law Professor and former Circuit Judge Michael McConnell suggested a course [read post]
6 Jul 2025, 4:06 pm by Josh Blackman
Justice Barrett is apparently not persuaded by Michael McConnell. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 5:18 am
It was lodged in January 2008 by Tina McGeever and her terminally ill husband, Michael Gray, and called [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:06 am
Appropriations Act for Defense (S. 2340)Text of the Bill as Introduced by Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 10:22 pm
  Here are some links to the very good posts which I read by Michael O'Hear (both here, [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 6:17 am by Frank Pasquale
Well, we now know the substance of the McConnell Rule was preemptive refusal to consider an eminently [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:35 pm by WIMS
" Additionally, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) immediately rejected the President [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:05 pm by David Kopel
Michael McConnell (Stanford) wrote an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal challenging the constituitonality [read post]