Search for: "Daphne Keller" Results 21 - 40 of 145
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2022, 4:40 pm by Aaron Mackey
The plaintiffs are represented by EFF, Davis, Wright Tremaine LLP, Walters Law Group, and Daphne Keller [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 7:15 am by Eric Goldman
The bill was pitched as a narrow and modest bipartisan reform of Section 230; and Daphne Keller of Stanford [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
From Annemarie Bridy and Daphne Keller’s submission to the U.S. [read post]
26 Mar 2025, 4:28 am by Tess Bridgeman
social media platforms to reduce harmful effects on U.S. democracy and society with expert guests Daphne [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 4:48 am by INFORRM
Daphne Keller is Director of Intermediary Liability at The Center for Internet and Society [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 10:26 am by Eugene Volokh
review.The post Journal of Free Speech Law: "Platform Transparency and the First Amendment," by Daphne [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 5:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Moderator: Daphne Keller, Stanford Cyber Policy Center    DSA represents a shift to operational [read post]
22 May 2019, 1:05 pm by Guest Blogger
Daphne Keller provides a policy tool kit for crafting new intermediary liability laws. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Policymakers in Europe and around the world are currently pursuing two reasonable-sounding goals for platform regulation. First, they want platforms to abide by a “duty of care,” going beyond today’s notice-and-takedown based legal models to more proactively weed out illegal content posted by users. Second, they want to preserve existing immunities, with platforms generally not facing liability for content they aren’t aware of. These goals both sound reasonable. On the… [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Conversations about unlawful online content and the responsibilities of Internet intermediaries have become more heated in recent years. Participants in these discussions often lack common terminology or understanding of technological options for online content control. This problem is not entirely new—there has never been a single agreed set of terms, and people have often used the same terms to mean different things. But miscommunications become more consequential as governments expand legal… [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 1:28 pm by Daphne Keller
Daphne Keller directs the Program on Platform Regulation at Stanford’s Cyber Policy Center. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 3:14 pm by Daphne Keller
Daphne Keller writes about Internet platforms and users’ rights. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Most people I talk to think that Facebook, Twitter, and other social media companies should take down ugly-but-legal user speech. Platforms are generally applauded for taking down racist posts from the White Nationalist demonstrators in Charlottesville, for example. I see plenty of disagreement about exactly what user-generated content should come down — breastfeeding images? Passages from Lolita? Passages from Mein Kampf? But few really oppose the basic predicate of these removals: that… [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 3:37 am by INFORRM
In a previous post, I described the growing calls for what I called a “systemic duty of care” (“SDOC”) in platform regulation. I suggested that SDOC requirements would create difficult questions in ordinary intermediary liability litigation. By encouraging or requiring platforms to review user content or exercise more control over it, SDOC laws would change courts’ reasoning in cases about YouTube’s liability for a defamatory video, for example. Plaintiffs in… [read post]