Search for: "Vikram David Amar" Results 301 - 320 of 431
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The Ninth Circuit, in SmithKline v. Abbott Labs, Bars Lawyers From Removing Gay/Lesbian Jurors: Part Two in a Two-Part Series
13 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Alan E. Brownstein
Vikram David Amar, a Justia columnist, is the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Professor of Law [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Three Big Constitutional Lessons of 2017 That Are Not Fully Appreciated
14 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
heading into a congressional election year such as 2018.Follow @prof_amar Vikram [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Some Aspects of the Matal v. Tam Trademark Case That Would Have Benefitted from More Explanation
13 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
anti-disparagement provision is clearly content based.Follow @prof_amar Vikram [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Doubts About Mitch McConnell’s Health Implicate Important Questions Under the Seventeenth Amendment
10 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
could be in the news much more than has been to date.Follow @prof_amar Vikram [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Analyzing the Recent Sixth Circuit’s Extension of “Academic Freedom” Protection to a College Teacher Who Refused to Respect Student Gender-Pronoun Preferences
15 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Alan E. Brownstein
of governors rein in more progressive professors.Follow @prof_amar Vikram [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
How Changing Ballot-Access Rules in an Election Year Can Raise Constitutional Problems: The Illinois Colazzo Case
12 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
article that is set to be published later this year.)Follow @prof_amar Vikram [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Could the Consumer Protection Finance Bureau (CFPB)’s Victory in the Supreme Court Last Week Boomerang to Disempower the Bureau and Invalidate its Regulations? Not if the Case is Read Carefully and Properly: A Response to Professor Hal Scott’s Wall Street Journal Op-Ed
22 May 2024, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
constitutional attacks that should or will ensue.Follow @prof_amar Vikram [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Reflections on the Movement in California to Repeal the State’s Ban on Affirmative Action
1 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
energetically than has been true in recent decades.Follow @prof_amar Vikram [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Important Developments in the White House and in the Fifth Circuit’s Wetzel Case Make More Likely (and More Important) Supreme Court Resolution of What Federal “Election Day” Means
30 Mar 2025, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
—is something that judges, too, should heed.Follow @prof_amar Vikram [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Why a Quid Pro Quo in the Eric Adams Affair Would Violate the Constitution: Lessons from the Anti-Commandeering Cases and Spallone v. United States
17 Feb 2025, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
not to affirmatively assist the federal government.Follow @prof_amar Vikram [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
The (Unwanted) Return of Bush v. Gore and Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s Underappreciated Impact on the 2020 Election
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
readers may also want to consult another piece published over a decade ago, penned by Professor Akhil Amar [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Is it Constitutional to Facilitate Exemption of Older Persons From Jury Service Based on Their Age? A California Provision Raises the Question
2 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
seems completely lacking in the case of Rule 2.1008.Follow @prof_amar Vikram [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Is the So-Called Mandate Without Any Tax Consequences Unconstitutional? And If So, How Should a Court Remedy That? Part Three in a Series Examining Underexplored Issues in the California v. Texas Affordable Care Act Case
15 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar, Evan Caminker and Jason Mazzone
those addressed in NFIB are discussed in a thought-provoking 2011 article by Yale Law Professor Akhil Amar [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
How First Amendment Speech Doctrine Ought to Be Created and Applied in the Colorado Baker/Gay Wedding Dispute at the Supreme Court
21 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Alan E. Brownstein
described do not support rigorous review in this case.Follow @prof_amar Vikram [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Why Coordinated Resistance by Law Firms to The Trump Administration’s Targeted Executive Orders Against BigLaw Would Not Run Afoul of Antitrust Restrictions
10 Apr 2025, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
association, and access to the assistance of counsel.Follow @prof_amar Vikram [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Why the Clean Air Act’s Special Treatment of California Is Permissible Even in Light of the Equal-Sovereignty Notion Invoked in Shelby County
1 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
challenge to the Clean Air Act should be rejected.Follow @prof_amar Vikram [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
North Dakota’s Measure 1 Asks “How Old is Too Old to Serve in DC?” The Constitution Has its Own Answers.
19 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Ethan Yan
norms of equality with respect to political rights.)Follow @prof_amar Vikram [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Understanding Free Speech Controversies on College Campuses: A Summary of a Very Helpful Conversation Between Two Leading Analysts—Erwin Chemerinsky and Geof Stone
3 May 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
v=b3eT7MKoXsEFollow @prof_amar Vikram David Amar is the Iwan Foundation [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Can a Public High School Punish a Student for Asking a Question that Refers to “Illegal Aliens”? Part One in a Two-Part Series
28 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
question of adequate notice) in Part II of the series.Follow @prof_amar Vikram [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Justice Jackson’s Dissent in Noem v. Doe: Long on Heart, Light on Legal Reasoning
2 Jun 2025, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
 Unfinished thought hereFollow @prof_amar Vikram David Amar is a [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/