Search for: "Eric Segall" Results 221 - 240 of 412
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2021, 10:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
  Eric Segall has commented on Professor Terbeek's article over at Dorf on Law. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 5:50 am by Howard Friedman
European Court of Human Rights, (The Jean Monnet Working Paper Series (NYU School of Law) 3/18 (2018).Eric [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 4:20 am by Howard Friedman
Jeremy Telman, Originalism as Fable (Reviewing Eric Segall, Originalism as Faith), (August 29, 2018). [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 8:33 am
Eric J. Magnuson (Ret.), Former Chief Justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court Hon. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 7:33 am by Eric Segall
Eric Segall is the Kathy and Lawrence Ashe Professor of Law at Georgia State University College of Law [read post]
18 Jul 2025, 9:30 pm by ernst
  "There is No Original Public Meaning of Imprecise Constitutional Text": Eric Segall [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 6:34 am by Mark Tushnet
This isn't a novel observation: Eric Segall has been making it for years.So what is going on when [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Esbeck, Eric Segall, Arnold H. Loewy, Elizabeth Sepper, Christopher C. Lund, William P. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 5:00 am by Unknown
Ross Douthat has waded into the Section Three conversation, siding with Eric Segall against his [read post]
14 May 2016, 8:54 am by Mark Tushnet
Eric Segall has an interesting postarguing, against my “against defensive crouch liberalism&rdquo [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Laborde, Abortion, Marriage and Cognate Problems, (American Journal of Jurisprudence (July 2018)).Matthew Segal [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
.'"A couple of weeks ago, my co-blogger Professor Eric Segall questioned what he deemed [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 8:00 am by JB
ES: Jack, to the best of my knowledge, and maybe I'm wrong, you have never addressed the many historical sources collected by Sylvia Snowiss, Jack Rakove and others showing that the framers quite clearly had a conception of judicial review that was modest, humble, and centered around clear constitutional error (and the 14th did not change that according to the best historians of that time other than possibly for protecting the newly freed slaves). I review all that, including Treanor's… [read post]
12 May 2021, 6:35 am by James Romoser
rsquo;s the Wednesday morning read: Reforming the Court: Five Non-Partisan and Much Needed Proposals (Eric [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 6:33 am by James Romoser
DeSanctis, National Review) The Justice Scalia Mythology that Still Haunts our Politics and our Law (Eric [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 6:55 am by SCOTUSblog
Supreme Court to Review CFPB Funding Case (Mark Rooney, JD Supra) Top Ten Worst SCOTUS Moments of 2022 (Eric [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 5:20 am by SCOTUSblog
Originalism Scorecard Since Justice Barrett Arrived on the Court: Living Constitutionalism is Way Ahead (Eric [read post]