Search for: "Sophie Stalla-Bourdillon"
Results 1 - 20
of 36
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2015, 7:29 am
Clare Linda Sullivan University of South Australia School of Law, and Sophie Stalla-Bourdillon, University [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 3:33 pm
Sophie Stalla-Bourdillon , Evangelia Papadaki and Tim Chown (University of Southampton , University of [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 2:13 am
Today the IPKat is delighted to host a guest contest organised by Kafriend Sophie Stalla-Bourdillon [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 11:57 pm
Fellow Kat Eleonora's friend and colleague Sophie Stalla-Bourdillon is already running this [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 11:33 am
Sophie Stalla-Bourdillon, Dr. Eleonora Rosati, Dr. Luke McDonagh and Karmen Turk. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 10:29 am
Vallejo Trujillo reports on the case for the IPTango Blog.Still talking about illegal content online, Sophie [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 6:50 am
Sophie Stalla-Bourdillon focuses on the fate of the status given to certain categories of intermediary [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 4:02 pm
Sophie Stalla-Bourdillon is Associate Professor in Information Technology and Intellectual Property Law [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 4:46 pm
” some might say… Sophie Stalla-Bourdillon is Associate Professor in Information Technology [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 8:27 am
The European Commission (EC) Recommendation of 1.3.2018 on measures to effectively tackle illegal content online (C(2018) 1177 final) is now freely accessible. As readers know, this is not the first time the EC has attempted to express meaningful thoughts (for lack of a better word, as once again the instrument is not strictly speaking binding on anyone, although the EC will monitor the effects of this Recommendation as per Chapter IV) on the topic. On 28 September 2017, for instance,… [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 4:35 pm
While the scope of intermediary liability exemptions is being discussed in several places around Europe (and beyond), it is interesting to go back to the Overblog legal saga, which a few years ago had been described by some as pre-announcing other popular sagas, such as the infamous Google Spain case (discussed in a previous post here). Over-blog.com is a blogging platform, which was “coded with love in Toulouse” a few years ago. Over-blog.com therefore hosts blogs created by its users,… [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 5:00 am
A few months after the now infamous judgment of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in Delfi v Estonia (for background, see my earlier post here), the Fourth Section of the Court issued on 2 February 2016 a judgment (MTE v Hungary) dealing with similar issues. Starting with the end of the judgement first, the Fourth Section held that there had been a violation of Article 10 of the Convention, i.e. that the violation could not be justified on the ground of… [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 5:24 pm
A lot has been written on the topic of intermediary liability in the past few months. But has everything been said or read? And looking at the different pieces of the regulatory jigsaw together, are we heading in the right direction? One important piece of the jigsaw is certainly the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) to become applicable in one year time, i.e. on 25 May 2018. The GDPR, or at least its Article 2(4) and Recital 21, has been welcome by several for it appears to clarify [at… [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 6:30 am
Empirical exploration of copynorms and fan fiction Huw Fryer, Sophie Stalla-Bourdillon and Tim Chown, [read post]
On Delfi v Estonia… Is it time to adopt a good-Samaritan style exemption? – Sophie Stalla-Bourdillon
23 Jun 2015, 4:56 pm
The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) recently upheld the decision of the First section in the case Delfi v Estonia, which in 2013 found that holding a news portal liable for the third-party comments posted on its Internet news portal did not amount to a violation of Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Given that we asked in an earlier post whether a passive and neutral intermediary could also be a data controller, it is interesting to have a look… [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 5:22 am
3.45 pm – 5.00 pm – Security Ray Corrigan, Chocolate and national security Huw Fryer, Sophie [read post]
28 May 2015, 4:01 pm
The decision in Ben Grubb and Telstra Corporation Limited ([2015] AICmr 35) is fascinating. It was issued on 1 May 2015 by Timothy Pilgrim, the Australian Privacy Commissioner – especially in the light of our recent posts, such as this one concerning Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and their roles as mere conduits and/or data controllers, or that one concerning the definitions of metadata. Telstra Corporation Limited (Telstra) describes itself as… [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 5:22 am
3.45 pm – 5.00 pm – Security Ray Corrigan, Chocolate and national security Huw Fryer, Sophie [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
The latest episode of the UK saga “and what do we do with data retention laws” has been issued by the English High Court, with its judgement in the case David Davis and Ors v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWHC 2092 (Admin). The claimants had applied for judicial review of the data retention powers in section 1 of the infamous DRIPA (the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014), previously discussed in posts here and here. [DRIPA substantively… [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 4:16 pm
While waiting to discuss with representatives of the European Commission at the first iCLIC Conference this week the implications of its Digital Single Market Strategy for Europe – as well as waiting for the issuing of the Commission’s forthcoming ‘public consultation on the regulatory environment for platforms, online intermediaries, data and cloud computing and the collaborative economy’ about to be published (already leaked by Politico here) – it is worth asking… [read post]
